Profile
Active Entries
- 1: Nerd math
- 2: Vid: "Been Caught Stealing", Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves festivid
- 3: Ugh
- 4: Grief
- 5: Why am I like this? (why am I)
- 6: Vid: "Friends", Heartstopper, for More Joy Day
- 7: new year who dis
- 8: Festivids: "Ode to Everything", an "Everything Everywhere All at Once" vid
- 9: Meme! (and a birthday)
- 10: Festivids: "Much Ado About True Love" and "Girls Chase Boys"
Style Credit
- Base style: Librarian's Dream by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot - Theme: Altair by dancing_serpent
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-19 08:52 pm (UTC)I flat-out stated in my response to Ms. Wrongheaded above:
"With all the safety measures that are currently in place at our schools, there is no situation that warrants such violation of the dignity and bodies of our minor children. I cannot begin to stress enough how wide open this proposal is to potential misconduct and malice. How can we promise to protect our children from unwanted contact everywhere but in their schools? How can the threat of this policy looming over those unfortunate children who are already survivors of assault and sexual abuse be anything but outright intimidation and a source of ongoing distress?
I for one refuse to trade the rights of our children to be safe from invasive assault for the short-sighted illusion of security offered by this proposal."
If this proposal doesn't die in a fire, there are definitely going to be heads on the block. This is a university town - I don't see the school board cowing the population of well-paid, well-educated parents here.